More propaganda. A ‘top climate scientist’ by the name of Chris Field (read political stooge) from the ‘Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’ (see what I mean about all politics & no science?) states ‘the climate is heating up faster than scientists predicted’.

Yeah? How come it’s not getting warmer then?  Oh, I forgot, this is not about science – it’s politics. He goes on to say ‘There is a real risk that human-caused climate change will accelerate …..’   I get tired of these assholes. Give me evidence that humans are to blame. But of course, you can’t, because it’s only a theory – and one that has scientifically been proved wrong. Why do these goons keep pedaling their witchcraft? Who is manipulating them and why? Presumably the same people who conned the world over Vietnam, Iraq, 9/11, etc. Only when you realise that the entire western world is actually controlled by one extremely powerful family, do the jigsaw pieces fall into place.  Meanwhile the misinformation continues, courtesy of goons like Mr Field.
‘Science without debate is propaganda’

Forget that goon Al Gore pedalling his fairy stories (most of which have now been scientifically proven to be wrong – in fact, his propaganda is so misleading, a UK High Court has ordered that if his film is shown to schoolchildren, it must be accompanied by a leaflet of corrections. I believe it runs to about a hundred pages).

For  some time I’ve pondered the reason why scientists would LIE about such a serious matter.
Certainly there’s money to be made (environmental taxes, carbon trading etc) by the governments who sponsor them, and the oil producing companies will benefit from higher prices, but does that warrant such a world-wide conspiracy?

But now we know.

It’s been even more opaque and underhand than we imagined.

Mayan and the other ancient histories of the world came to the same conclusion – 2012AD is the end of the present world. Many have since wondered if this meant physical destruction of our planet. Tie this in with the Biblical forecast of a new, evil, World Order and the Copenhagen Treaty and it all becomes clear.  The UN has managed, through the inter-government panel on climate change (IPCC), to invoke that process tried and tested by dictators over the centuries – create an external threat and then manipulate the people to attack it.

The threat, of course, is Global Warming, and the end aim is World Government.
Presumably the none-too-bright environmentalists believe the Copenhagen Treaty’s purpose is to limit man’s damage to the planet? They’re wrong on all counts.

First, it is now scientifically proven that man is not causing global warming, and released e-mails now show that the entire hoax has been perpetrated by no more than a dozen or so bent scientists from the Climate Research Centre of the University of East Anglia.

Have the know-all environmentalists read the Treaty? I doubt it.
Be very worried – the Copenhagen Treaty is about creating a World Government – one that is unelected and superior to national governments (rather like the EU but many times more powerful).

Its second declared purpose is to ‘transfer wealth’ from rich nations to poorer ones.

Read this (Dec 11th)

Brown and Sarkozy reiterated estimates that climate change policies will cost €100bn a year from 2020 in transfers from the rich to the poor worlds. -
A hundred billion per year !!! It is straight-forward Communism of the entire world – and all on the back of an invented threat that doesn’t exist! I have to admit I never realised those die-hard environmentalists who wouldn’t engage in a proper debate (the science is settled, thousands of scientists agree the concensus”!!) are actually communists plotting a world takeover.
Don’t believe me? Try the sites below for an illuminating & factual analysis.
As a matter of fact, I’ve been in contact with Lord Monckton and am planning to get him to speak in Jersey early in 2010.

In the meantime, lobby your Deputy / Senator to ensure that if the UK signs away their sovereignty at least they don’t take us down with them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqOvX2-EwvI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stij8sUybx0

And just one way this bullshit will affect us:
Frequent fliers could face higher tax says Government climate adviser
Frequent fliers could be taxed more, Lord Turner, the Government’s climate change adviser has said,.
By David Millward, Transport Editor
Published: 3:31PM GMT 08 Dec 2009

Lord Turner, chairman of Government’s Committee on Climate Change.
The chairman of the Government’s Committee on Climate Change suggested those who flew more often should face higher levies than those who travelled infrequently.
Lord Turner was speaking as the Committee unveiled its report which said drastic action – including higher taxes – were needed to curb the growth in aviation demand over the next four decades.

Related Articles
• Fresh taxes needed to curb rise in aviation
• Households face rise in bills because of Government failure on renewables
• Flights could be rationed, says environment tsar Lord Turner
• Climate change targets will push up energy prices
• Lord Adonis: We can cut greenhouse gas emissions without travelling less
• Climate change measures will cause rise in fuel bills says minister
In its report, the Committee said that the number of people flying to and from British airports should increase by no more than 60 per cent by 2050 for the Government to meet its target of ensuring that aviation’s carbon emissions are no higher then than they were in 2005.
It has called for the cost of air travel to be raised by a number of means including higher taxes, charging airlines more for the carbon they use.

And here’s a link for anyone left who still thinks Global Warming is of the slightest concern:-

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/videos/bobcarter.html

And lastly – the useful idiots of warming fundamentalism would have us believe most scientists agree that global warming is man-made. Yeah? Read on:-

The Leipzig Declaration

As independent scientists researching atmospheric and climate problems, we — along with many of our fellow citizens — are apprehensive about the Climate Treaty conference scheduled for Kyoto, Japan, in December 1997. This gathering of politicians from some 160 signatory nations aims to impose — on citizens of the industrialized nations, but not on others — a system of global environmental regulations that include quotas and punitive taxes on energy fuels.

Fossil fuels provide today’s principal energy source, and energy is essential for all economic growth. Stabilizing atmospheric carbon dioxide — the announced goal of the Climate Treaty — would require that fuel use be cut by as much as 60 to 80 percent — worldwide!

In a world in which poverty is the greatest social pollutant, any restriction on energy use that inhibits economic growth should be viewed with caution. We understand the motivation to eliminate what are perceived to be the driving forces behind a potential climate change; but we believe the emerging Kyoto protocol — to curtail carbon dioxide emissions from only part of the world community — is dangerously simplistic, quite ineffective, and economically destructive jobs and standards-of-living.

More to the point, we consider the scientific basis of the 1992 Global Climate Treaty to be flawed and its goal to be unrealistic. The policies to implement the Treaty are, as of now, based solely on unproven scientific theories, imperfect computer models — and unsupported assumptions that catastrophic global warming follows from the burning of fossil fuels and requires immediate action. We do not agree. We believe that the dire predictions of a future warming have not been validated by the existing climate record. These predictions are based on nothing more than theoretical models and cannot be relied on.

As the debate unfolds, it has become increasingly clear that — contrary to the conventional wisdom — there does not exist today a general scientific consensus about the importance of greenhouse warming from rising levels of carbon dioxide. In fact, many climate specialists now agree that actual observations from weather satellites show no global warming whatsoever — in direct contradiction to computer model results.
Historically, climate has alw
ays been a factor in human affairs — with warmer periods, such as the medieval “climate optimum,” playing an important role in economic expansion and in the welfare of nations that depend primarily on agriculture. Colder periods have caused crop failures, and led to famines, disease, and other documented human misery. We must, therefore, remain sensitive to any and all human activities that could affect future climate.

However, based on all the evidence available to us, we cannot subscribe to the politically inspired world view that envisages climate catastrophes and calls for hasty actions. For this reason, we consider the drastic emission control policies likely to be endorsed by the Kyoto conference — lacking credible support from the underlying science — to be ill-advised and premature.

This statement is based on the International Symposium on the Greenhouse Controversy, held in Leipzig, Germany on November 9-10, 1995, under the sponsorship of the Prime Minister of the State of Saxony. For further information, contact the Europaeische Akademie fuer Umweltfragen (fax: 011-49-7071-72939) or The Science & Environmental Policy Project in Fairfax, Virginia (fax: (703) 352-7535). Or visit the website .

Signers:

Abrams, Elliot – Penn State University
Apel, John – John Hopkins University
Aubrey, David – Woods Hole Ocean. Inst.
Badura, Leslaw – Univ. Kattositz, Polland
Balling, Robert – Arizona State University
Barrett, Jack – Kingston-upon-Thames, U.K.
Bauer, Ernst-Waldemar – Esslingen, Germany
Berg, Hermann – Sachsisch Akad., Jena, Germany
Berning, Warren – New Mexico State University
Boe, Bruce A. – Atm. Resource Brd. ND
Bottcher, C.J. Frits, The Hague
Bourne, Arthur – University of London
Bruce, Larry
Brown, Norman M.D., University of Ulster
Bye, Matthew – Meterologist, San Francisco
Cain, Joseph – Florida State University
Clube, S.V.M. – University of Oxford
Courtney, Richard – Epsom, U.K.
Csanady, G.T – Old Dominion University
Cunningham, Robert M. – Meterologist, Lincoln, MA
Decker, Fred – Meterologist, Corvalis, OR
de Freitas, Chris, University of Auckland
Del Re, Giuseppe Rom.
Dietze, Peter – Nurnberg, Germany
Dyer, Rosemary – Phillips Lab
Eddington, Lee W., Naval Air Warfare Center
Ellsaesser, Hugh – Livermore National Laboratory
Emsley, John, Imperial Collage
Frank, Neil – Fmr. Dir. Hurricane Center
Franzle, Otto – Univ. Kiel, Germany
Gaynor, John E. – Envir. Tech. Lab., Boulder, CO
Gerholm, Tor Ragnar – Univ of Stockholm
Gleeson, Thomas A. – Aeronomist, Florida State Univ.
Gold, Thomas – Cornell University
Goodell, H.G. – University of Virginia
Goodridge, James D. – Climatologist, Mendocino, CA
Groeber, Richard F. – Weather Service, Springfield, OH
Guttman, Nathaniel B. – Climate Center, Asheville, NC
Hales, J. Vern – Meterologist, Las Vegas, NV
Handler, Paul, University of Illinois
Harnapp, Vern, University of Akron
Hayden, Howard C. – Univ. of Connecticut
Heyke, H.H. – Lichtenwalde, Germany
Higastberger, Michael J. – University of Vienna
Hogan, A.W. – Jour. of Aerosols, Atm. Chem.
Hubbard, William, University of Arizona
Jaworski, Zbigniew, University of Warsaw
Kloke, Adolf – University of Berlin
Kohler, Max A. – Meterologist, Silver Spring, MD
Kolstad, George A. – Geophys., Laytonsville, MD
Korber, Erich – Univ. Tubingen, Germany
Kovach, Robert L. – Stanford University
Landscheidt, Theodor, Nova Scotia
Leep, Roy – Meterologist, Tampa, FL
Legates, David R. – University of Oklahoma
Lettau, Heinz H. – University of Wisconsin
Linden, Henry R. – Illinois Inst. of Technology
Lindzen, Richard, Mass. Inst. of Technology
Lischka, Gerd – Univ. Tubingen, Germany
Lodge, J.P. – Atmos. Chemist, Boulder, CO
Lunardini, Virgil, CRREL, Hanover, NH
Lunsford, R. Dwayne, Germantown, MD
Marquardt, Karl – Dornstadt-Auhausen, Germany
McVehil, George E. – Air Quality, Englewood, CO
Mellner, Dusan – Univ of Brno, Czech Republic
Metzner, Helmut – Tubingen, Germany
Michaels, Patrick – University of Virginia
Mitchell, William, Oxford University
Moene, Asmunn, Oslo, Norway
Mohry, Herbert – Leipzig, Germany
Neumann, Eberhard – Univ. Bielefeld, Germany
Nierenberg, William A. – Scripps Inst., LaJolla
Nolte, Dieter – Stadt, Krankenhaus, Reichenhall, Germany
Oberhammer, Heinz – Univ, Tubingen, Germany
Porch, William – Colorado State University
Priem, Harry, University Of Utrecht
Reifsnyder, W.E. – Yale University
Robertson, Alexander, Univ. Of Newfoundland
Schmidlin, Thomas, Kent State University
Schuh, William, ND State Water Comm.
Seitz, Frederick – Rockefeller University
Sestak, Zdnek – Univ of Prague
Sharp, Gary D., Ctr for Climate/Ocean Resource Study
Singer, Fred – Science & Environmental Policy Project
Stange, Karl – Ludwigshafen, Germany
Starheim, Fred, Kent State University
Starr, Chauncey – Electrical Power Research Inst., Palo Alto
Steinmetz, E. – Essen, Germany
Stevenson, Robert E., IFARNS/IAPSO
Stout, Glenn E. – University of Illinois
Stroke, George – Max Planck Inst., Munich
Sundermann, Heinz – University of Vienna
Sussman, Brian – Meterologist, San Francisco, CA
Sutton, George H. – Prof. Emeeritus, Univ of Hawaii
Svidersky, Vladimir – Sechonoc Institute, Moscow
Talwani, M. – Rice University
Torrance, Thomas F. – Jena, Germany
Van Sumere, Christaan – Univ of Gent, Belgium
Vonnegut, Bernard – SUNY, Albany
Wentworth, Robert C., Geoophys. Oakland, CA
Worzel, J. Larmar – Meterologist, Wilmington, NC
Wyrtki, Klaus, University of Hawaii
Zwiener, Ulrich – Univ. Jena, Germany

Meteorologists
Apuzzo, Richard, WXIX-TV
Bernier, Andre, WJW-TV
Bernier, Sally, WJW-TV
Breckm, Robert, WVUE-TV
Colby, A.J., WICU-TV
Frank, Neil, KHOU-TV
Gantz, Dick, Weather Forecasting Service
Goddard, Dick, WJW-TV
Hollett, Shane, WJW-TV
Johnson, Mark, WEWS-TV
Koontz, Mark, WJW-TV
Leep, Roy, WTVT-TV
Loufman, Jon, WKYC-TV
Maly, Dan, WOIO-TV
McPike, Ryan, WICU-TV
Moore, James T., KSWO-TV
Sussman, Brian, KGO-TV
Sussman, Brad, WEWS-TV
Watts, Anthony, HSL-TV
Webster, Don, WEWS-TV
Westfall, Brian, Weather Forecasting Service
Williams, Jerry A., Meteorologist Consultant

And finally, just read this (March 21st) from a respected contributor in the USA :

Researchers admit to global warming lies

I’ve told you over and over that global warming is nothing more than politically motivated hot air. And now, one by one, climate-change scientists are falling like those glaciers they want us to worry so much about.

Take Professor Phil Jones, one of the world’s leading Chicken Littles. Last autumn, e-mails surfaced in which he essentially admitted to fudging data on global warming and deliberately avoiding Freedom of Information requests from skeptics.

Jones isn’t alone in his deception. Hardly a week goes by that another climate-change scientists isn’t caught lying, cheating, backtracking, pulling data or making unsubstantiated claims.

Remember the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change? They’re the group that won the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize along with Al Gore for their panic-inducing report on the imminent climate Armageddon.

Do they ever take those prizes back? Because it turns out that report has some problems as big as the Himalayan glaciers they warned could disappear by 2035.

A key figure behind the report recently admitted that they had no real data to back that up. They made the claim anyway, as the Mail puts it, “purely to put political pressure on world leaders.”

In yet another climate-change backtrack, scientist have been forced to withdraw a study that claimed global warming would cause sea levels to rise by more than 32 inches by the end of the century.

Turns out they had to fess up to not one but TWO major errors in their study, which was published in Nature Geoscience, one of the leading journals in the field.

The gig is up, fellas. With each new report, it becomes abundantly clear that climate-change fanatics are more interested in pushing their agenda than they are in saving the world.

                                                    —————

Added May 29th 2010:-

The ‘Useful Idiots’ are on the march – It’s time to crash ‘The Wave’!

Neil Foster, The Sovereign Independent

On June 2^nd across the European capitals of Dublin, London, Paris, Berlin, Brussels, Glasgow and Belfast, a march will take place simultaneously with a demand to their respective governments for strong action on climate change.

The Stop Climate Change organisation is sponsored by many familiar names in the pseudo environmentalist lobby.

Link to the Irish website here:

http://www.stopclimatechaos.ie/

Rockefeller’s ‘Useful idiots’

Apart from the obvious manipulation of the ‘useful idiots’, there is a far more sinister aspect of this ‘movement’ which calls itself  “The Wave” and appears to be based on the novel of the same name.

The Wave is a 1981 young adult novel by Todd Strasser under the pen name Morton Rhue. It is a novelization of a teleplay by Johnny Dawkins for the movie The Wave, a fictionalized account of the “Third Wave” teaching experiment by Ron Jones that took place in a Cubberley High School history class in Palo Alto, California. The novel by Strasser won the 1981 Massachusetts Book Award for Children’s/Young Adult literature.

Following the publication of the novel a TV drama was produced. In the film and the book the plot revolves around a group of students being coerced into a fascist type organisation calling themselves “The Wave”. They are taught discipline and the importance of collectivism whereby they tolerate no outside opinion against them and shun all outsiders including family and friends. They are also given a ‘salute’ to enable them to recognise fellow initiates as well as being instructed to wear clothing coloured blue and also given armbands with their ‘wave’ logo. They are also brainwashed using slogans and chants until they become fully indoctrinated into the cult.

The TV version can be viewed on google video here:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4689717947890475769#

Moving forward to 2008, there was a remake set in Germany in modern times further expanding on the theme and showing how modern technology can be utilised to further organise the group. As one would expect in modern film the intensity and final outcome of the film are a little more extreme. In this version the group are encouraged to wear white clothing and the ‘wave’ logo is again used to identify the cult.

A trailer of the film can be seen here:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4689717947890475769#docid=-2364827171974052535

On June 2^nd, the above named organisation, Stop Climate Chaos will march through European capitals calling themselves ‘”The Wave”.

Is this just a coincidence or has this 1967 experiment been put into action to indoctrinate our children into a fascist cult movement by means of predictive programming? Some scenes in both movies are startlingly reminiscent of Obama’s Youth Corp who cannot seem to break the spell of control over them despite the obvious signs of danger inherent in such a group.

Are we seeing the rise of Fascism and indeed an ‘EU Youth Brigade’ similar to the Hitler Youth? They even brag about being ‘flash mobs’ on their website further exhibiting their mindset.

Watch the original movie free on google and make your own mind up. There is one dialogue around 34 ½ minutes which is worth listening to.

The Sovereign Independent will be there to film the event as well as attending the accompanying meetings with politicians in a nearby hotel where we have a few who have agreed to be interviewed on camera as to their opinions on the matter of ‘climate change’.

I encourage everyone who cares about their children’s future to attend these events in their own European capitals to get the message across that manmade climate change is a non-event and simply a tool to control society from cradle to grave.

Short URL: http://www.sovereignindependent.com/?p=4199

                                                                                                                                 000000000000000000000000000000000