Be Worried!
Be Worried!
Dec 14th ‘09
Are you one who is fed up with government ‘not listening to the people’? Believe politicians are ‘feathering their own nest’? Believe most politicians are incompetent? Concerned about the seemingly never-ending problems facing us, eg. violence in St Helier at night (don’t be fooled by political assurances – a native of Manchester who was here recently was terrified in St Helier, branding it much more dangerous than her city) ? Are you ‘struggling to get by’ whilst the public sector appears to be doing very nicely thank you? Annoyed by GST – and other taxes about to be introduced? Concerned about the Waterfront plans, the incinerator, etc etc?
Then be worried, be very worried.
Read on – I apologise in advance for the length of this article, but there’s a lot of ground to cover. I could write a book and probably make money out of this, but that’s not what I’m about. Trying to improve the quality of people’s lives and assist those who cannot make headway in the morass is why I was a States member for ten years – until ‘the establishment’ finally achieved their aim of getting rid of me because I was too much of an irritation to them. I asked too many questions and didn’t swallow their spin & lies.
*
Like I said, there’s a lot of ground to cover. In trying to be concise, I may assume the reader knows something when he doesn’t – contact me if you need clarification.
So let’s start at the beginning – always a good strategy.
At the top of the page, I listed a few grumbles many people express from time to time. Trouble is, most people assume government is trying to run things for the general benefit of everyone. In so doing, people fail to see that the latter is only a façade – behind which the real plan is being implemented.
For years I tried to understand how it was so many developments had an energy of their own.
Take ministerial government for example. Did you press for machinery of government change? Do you know anyone who did? No? I thought so.
It was ‘spun’ to the people by a group of establishment supporters, making it seem that it was the public who wanted the change. One of the main advantages suggested by senator Horsfall was that ‘massive savings’ would accrue. I kept asking where and when these ‘savings’ would appear. You can guess the answers and how far I got.
The real reason why Committee government – where all States members were involved in running the Island – was replaced by a Council of ministers – where ten members run the Island and the other 43 have to guess what they’re up to – will hopefully become clear as we move along.
Then there’s the waterfront development: The sunken road (with another new surface road nearby that proves the reason given for needing the new road as ‘unfettered pedestrian access’ is a lie): the 700,000 sq ft of new office space that no-one needs – we were told 14 firms wanted to re-locate there. That was another lie – there was one. Then there’s all the concerns surrounding the developer, which ‘the establishment’ tried to hush up but, by diligent research and tenacity, I managed to get into the public domain.
What about the new incinerator? Latest figures suggest the bill has risen from £100m to perhaps £110m – through negligence & incompetence. Why did the Department tell the firm who would have built this for £60m not to bother to tender? I was pressing for an Inquiry into this unacceptable waste of taxpayers’ money, but was voted out of the States before I could progress it. I suggested to some new members they might wish to take on my Proposition, but they haven’t bothered.
Oh, and the cost of the new road required is being kept pretty quiet – it’s around £50m.
This is where we must take a leap forward and open our eyes.
Our government, in company with the UK, USA and many others, consists of wheels within wheels. The obvious face is everyday business – provision of health services, education, road and infrastructure maintenance & repair etc etc.
However, whilst 99.9% of the public and 90% (in Jersey’s case) of politicians believe that is all government is doing, there are a few (the purpose of this article is to hopefully increase the number) who realise there is a hidden agenda running quietly in the background.
Remember the examples above – ministerial government, incinerator and waterfront ?
Here’s another – with great effort, I managed, to ministers fury, to expose not only the waterfront telephone scam perpetrators and, later, the waterfront scam itself (otherwise known as ‘development’) but the existence and details of the Corporate Management Board.
This group consists of all the Departmental Chief Officers, including the Police Chief. They are chaired by the States Chief Executive, Bill Ogley and, until my successful Proposition, not only met in secret, but States members weren’t even allowed to know what they discussed! Clearly they weren’t discussing golf handicaps – at least I hope not, given that this lot collectively cost around £1,000 per hour.
My successful Proposition enables all States members to now have access to the minutes of their meetings. A small, but very important matter that was vigorously opposed by the Council of Ministers. The Chief Minister (F. Walker) even said my Proposition should be rejected because it would cost a fortune employing a clerk to take minutes – until he was reminded minutes were already taken!
Welcome to ministerial government – all spin and lies.
*
Enough of examples. I hope you now get a glimpse of what I’m driving at.
It’s taken me twenty years to get to where I am uncovering what’s really going on, so I can assure you this is not some crazy theory I’m proffering. Those who knew my political work – even those against me – recognised I was thorough in my research and homework.
So what is going on?
Take another fast forward in understanding.
Have you read the predictions for the year 2012? Not the ones in the media – more of how they are under political control later – but ancient civilisations such as the Mayans?
How about the Bible? I refer to the Old Testament, not the New, the latter has been heavily edited / censored by the church of Rome. Remember, the pope’s moniker is ‘vicar of Christ’ – which adds up to 666 – ‘the number of the Beast’.
There’s much more – I recommend reading ‘Web of Deceit’ by Mark Curtis, ‘The Growth Illusion’ by Richard Douthwaite, and ‘Underground Bases’ by Richard Sauder.
Of course, to enable one to ‘see everything from all angles’ – and thereby be in a position to sift reality from theory – or the downright absurd – requires a lot more.
There are many authors out there enabling one to achieve that ‘rounded view’.
Zecharia Sitchin’s research is illuminating. Titles include ‘Lost book of Enki’ and ‘Journeys to the Mythical Past’. ‘Slave Species of God’ by Michael Tellinger is another excellent example.
*
Why is all this important?
Because until one sees the big picture, the real issues will continue to slip under the radar. Follow this: The USA has a goal – a New World Order (as prophesied in the Bible) which, when you examine it, is terrifying – Google in ‘American Camps’ and read about the new concentration camps in USA – it’s 1930’s Germany all over again. The cross examination of Colonel Oliver North is particularly revealing. We have seen how the USA & Britain tried to control the Middle East – first by putting a Shah of Persia to rule what is now Iran; then the illegal invasion of Iraq on the back of outright lies. Then there’s Vietnam, Nicaragua and any number of invasions and subversions of sovereign states. Now there’s Afganistan, where the goal is again oil. The public are softened up to accept the waste of soldiers’ lives on the lie that it’s fighting terrorism. That’s bullshit – the reality is the biggest terrorist organisation in the world is the USA with its imperialistic ambitions with Britain, having lost its Empire, keen to hang onto the trappings of power by being America’s poodle. The truth is, anybody or organisation that stands in the way of America’s agenda is branded a ‘terrorist’. Hitler used similar tactics.
And whilst we’re on Hitler, let’s look at the War on Smoking. It is a complete hoax. Political propaganda masquerading as science. It has been known for over ten years that that ‘passive smoking’ does not cause lung cancer – but you haven’t been told. Since smoking prohibition, asthma has increased threefold – and lung cancer rates doubled.
Nicotine is a poison – but – like most poisons, becomes a medicine in controlled circumstances. The difference between a poison and a medicine is the dose. Nicotine benefits pre-enclampsya, Tourette’s syndrome, Parkinsons, Alzheimers and many other problems. Hitler, another product of ‘the establishment’ called smoking ‘masurbation of the lungs’ – and a disgrace to the master race. The similarities between Hitler’s anti-smoking campaign and the messages given today by the neo-Nazi environmental movement is scary. At least we don’t blame it on Jews, homosexuals, gypsies etc. Nevertheless, we are told a pack of lies. Just compare the USA & Japan – Japanese are some of the heaviest smokers, USA is way down the scale. How come, then, Japan rates 3rd in the world’s longevity table, and the USA 29th?
How does all this affect us? Because we follow like sheep, dictated to by Britain. Today it’s war on smokers – tomorrow fat people – who’s next in the plan the clean up the ‘master race’?
Where do you think the idea of ministerial government came from? Couldn’t possibly be anything to do with the fact the format we adopted was exactly the same as the UK’s policy for all Councils of over 80,000 souls? Surely not!!!
It’s all about control, with the ultimate aim of enslaving its own people. And, no, I haven’t been drinking – the truth is out there if only you look. The trouble is, governments have been extremely clever: the media no longer publishes objective analysis, it merely prints or broadcasts material it receives daily (in volume) from government spin offices. And government will wait for a ‘bad news day’ to bury new policies that takes us nearer their goal.
The House of Lords recently remarked that Britain is fast becoming a ‘surveillance society’. There are CCTV cameras everywhere – on the pretext of combating crime. At airports, security is comprehensive – on outgoing passengers! If it was about anti-terrorist measures they would be screening people coming into the country.
All internet usage and mobile ‘phone data is stored, landlines are ‘tapped’, most car journeys (in the UK) recorded. It is now planned to introduce ‘e-borders’ – whereby every movement in and out of the UK is stored on computer.
The Times newspaper recently carried the following: ‘There is something profoundly dispiriting in the principle of us all being suspects: universal surveillance rather than targeted concentration on known criminals’.
But don’t worry – that dimwit Terry, our Chief Minister, has told the UK that he ‘welcomes e-borders’ !!
How does this happen under our noses? As I said, government has acted cleverly.
All those irritating invasions of our privacy – legalised telephone tapping, soon-to-be e-borders, CCTV, monitoring of mobile and internet etc etc – are almost tolerated because they are sold to the public as necessary to combat crime or terrorism.
Were it not for those labels, those measures would be rejected by the public.
There is an underhand policy to prevent private ownership of firearms. The excuse given is ‘public safety’. It is nothing of the sort – gun crime has increased threefold since the draconian anti-gun measures of just a few years ago. It is actually about disarming society so there can be no resistance when the penny finally drops and the public realises – too late – what has been going on.
Hitler once remarked how foolish it would be to let the public own firearms.
Government propaganda is working. We are softened up by a complicit media (who have us believe that 9/11 was carried out by terrorists, when, as evidence shows, it was a self-damage by America in order to panic the public into accepting war) – just as America facilitated the attack on Pearl Harbour & the start of the Vietnam war; and Russia allegedly attacked itself in order to blame the Chechnians.
Donald Rumsfeld admitted it was a missile that hit the Pentagon, not an aircraft. Whose missile, and where did it come from? (The Pentagon has its own anti-missisle system – the only way an incoming warhead could penetrate was if it was recognised as ‘friendly’ – ie made in the USA).Then we’re told it’s the Palestinians, not Israel who are the aggressors in the middle east. Really?
And so it goes on. We’re led to believe all the information-gathering intrusions into our lives are safety-orientated, when the real reason is a lot more scary.
*
And it all happens because governments rely on the public’s selfishness.
Instead of looking around ourselves, we have got into a comfort zone of ‘I’m alright, sod everyone else’. As long as people have a reasonably comfortable home and a nice car & TV, they don’t care about the big wide world.
I remember a fellow Deputy observing that people only care about their home and one hundred yards each side. Of course, they want a 20mph zone outside their house – but want to drive at 40mph past everyone else’s.
They vote for politicians on narrow issues – promise a lower speed limit or a zebra crossing, and you’re in. Later, that same public moans about the performance of those same politicians. Is it any wonder?
I’ll bet there’s less than half a dozen States members who really know what’s going on – even some ministers don’t understand the bigger picture and who is pulling the strings.
Who is actually running the western world (which includes us at the end of the line) is very complicated – you’ve got to start with the Knights Templar, figure out what 33degree masons know – and then guess what the Rothschild and Rockerfeller families are up to. We’re talking real power here – the sort that starts world wars – the sort that backed both sides in WW2, because much was to be made from selling armaments and, whoever won, they’d be on the winning side ready to do business.
Until people understand these things, governments – including ours – will carry on running matters not for the benefit of the public, but to achieve the end goal – a New World Order. We all remain pawns in that game, until the majority look out from their comfort zone into reality. Sadly, by then it will probably be too late to stop it.
So, when you wonder why we paid over £100m for an incinerator we could have bought for £60m, why a new waterfront worth £700m is about to be built, why the Chief minister has told the UK that Jersey wholeheartedly supports e-borders, why governments want you to feel guilty about global warming (whilst they build new airports to increase aviation’s use of oil) – it’s to instil fear – a powerful weapon of control. (see also my comments elsewhere on this site about global warming).
Maybe you’re now beginning to understand.
Don’t believe me? Read those books I suggested. Google ‘American Camps’, (http://www.apfn.org/apfn/camps.htm) and look up scientific reports on 9/11.
The world is not as you think.
And finally – remember what started WW2 – economic depression. We have that now. And remember how Churchill warned the country in the 30’s what was happening, but people ignored him – ‘don’t spoil our party’ was the response. Had people listened, WW2 would never have happened.
The ‘New World Order’ promises to make WW2 look like a slight misunderstanding.
Are you aware of the proposals to reduce the world’s population by 80%?
Is the current ‘flu scare genuine – or is it an excuse to persuade everyone to be vaccinated?
Be alarmed when officials state ‘it won’t be compulsory’ – suggesting they have considered it might be. What (apart from mercury and other poisons that are put in vaccines) is in these injections? Does anyone know?
I only hope enough people are looking at the ‘big picture’ and not adopting the selfish ‘don’t spoil our party’ attitude now. If they are seeking the ‘big picture’, we can avoid the bloodshed and misery ahead. But I’m not holding my breath.
Have a nice day.
Try this:-
Telecom firms’ fury at plan for ‘Stasi’ checks on every phone call and email
(Mail, Sunday Dec 27th ’09)
Phone companies have criticised Britain’s growing ’surveillance culture’
Telecoms firms have accused the Government of acting like the East German Stasi over plans to force them to store the details of every phone call for at least a year.
Under the proposals, the details of every email sent and website visited will also be recorded to help the police and security services fight crime and terrorism.
But mobile phone companies have attacked the plans as a massive assault on privacy and warned it could be the first step towards a centralised ‘Big Brother’ database. They have also told the Home Office that the scheme is deeply flawed.
The criticism of Britain’s growing ‘surveillance culture’ was made in a series of responses to an official consultation on the plans, which have been obtained by The Mail on Sunday.
T-Mobile said in its submission that it was a ‘particularly sensitive’ time as many people were commemorating the 20th anniversary of the protests that led to the collapse of ‘surveillance states in Eastern Europe’.
Martin Hopkins, head of data protection and disclosure, said: ‘It would be extremely ironic if we at T-Mobile (UK) Ltd had to acquire the surveillance functionality envisaged by the Consultation Document at the same time that our parent company, headquartered in Germany, was celebrating the 20th anniversary of the demise of the equivalent systems established by the Stasi in the federal states of the former East Germany.’
Equally trenchant was the response from Hutchinson 3G Uk Ltd, which read: ‘We take seriously the responsibility of safeguarding our customers’ information and data, and are unconvinced of the safeguards that the Government might make to protect against loss.’
The firm also said it had ‘substantial concerns’ over claims that public authorities would only be able to access data on a ‘case-by-case’ basis. It is understood hundreds of public bodies and quangos may also be able to obtain information from the system.
‘It is our belief the safeguards listed in this consultation are incomplete and do not extend far enough,’ it added.
Orange and Vodafone were also highly critical, with a spokesman for Orange saying: ‘The proposals are clearly not about “maintaining” capabilities but rather about “enhancing” existing capabilities.
‘Any debate should address what many will see as a worrying extension of the so-called “surveillance culture”.’
Since October 2007, telecoms companies have been obliged to keep records for a year. Under the new legislation, however, they will also be required to organise it better – for example, by grouping calls made by the same person. Internet service providers have been required to hold records on emails and website visits since April.
Police and security services can already obtain such information if they are given permission by the courts.
The public will reimburse internet service providers and telecoms companies for the costs associated with storing the billions of records.
A Home Office spokesman said: ‘The police and security services need to be able to use communication data in the fight against crime and terrorism. Communications data forms an important element of prosecution evidence in 95 per cent of the serious crime cases.
‘Access to communications data under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act is subject to strict safeguards around how, when and by whom data is obtained.’
The activities of the Stasi, the former East Germany’s secret police, were memorably depicted in the Oscar-winning film The Lives Of Others, starring Ulrich Mühe. At the regime’s height, there were 200,000 agents and informers in a population of only 16million.
Comments are closed.